KidneyData and context
Patient-generated records sit beside personal targets, clinical notes and guideline-informed context.
Research and evidenceWe did the research
We did the research
before the marketing.
KidneyMate is grounded in a three-layer conceptual framework, wider CKD literature and a public validation plan. The framework is currently under peer review.
The frameworkThree connected layers.
Three connected layers.
One accountable pathway.
A Conceptual Framework for Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management Support is currently under peer review. A publication link will be added when confirmed.
Transparent analysis
Rule-based comparisons turn longitudinal records into inspectable patterns, trends and review signals.
Clinician review
Qualified people interpret, validate and contextualise outputs before feedback or action.
What we must show,
and how.
- 01Expert review
Clinicians and health-informatics researchers scrutinise the framework and prototype.
- 02Prototype refinement
What experts and users break, we rebuild, document and version.
- 03Governed pilots
Small Australian pilots with formal ethics, privacy and consent arrangements.
- 04Stated evaluation
Usability, interpretability, clinical relevance, transparency, workflow fit and acceptance.
- 05Publication
Results go into the literature whichever way they land.
Working evidence baseWhat the literature says.
What the literature says.
What we took from it.
Peer-reviewed study2025
Global, regional and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990 to 2023
GBD CKD Collaborators · The LancetCKD affects hundreds of millions of adults; self-management support needs to scale beyond clinic hours.
Clinical guideline2024
KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD
Kidney InternationalKidneyMate’s tracking domains reflect established CKD-management priorities rather than generic wellness metrics.
Peer-reviewed study2022
Electronic symptom monitoring with clinician feedback
Viecelli et al. · AJKDMonitoring becomes meaningful when it is paired with engagement and a defined clinical feedback pathway.
Randomised study2020
Mobile health support for CKD self-management
Li et al. · JMIREncouraging signals support proper validation, not premature outcome claims.
Systematic review2019
eHealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease
Stevenson et al. · CochraneFragmented single-function tools dominate; integration and clinical accountability remain gaps.
Systematic review2018
The work of being an adult patient with CKD
Roberti et al. · BMJ OpenA useful product must reduce daily burden rather than add another reporting task.
This is a concise website summary, not a complete bibliography. Source links will be added after publication and clinical review.
This is the good stage
to arrive.
Validation partners, pilot sites and research collaborators can materially shape the work now.
Start a research conversation ↗